1 00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:03,000 Have you ever wondered why Hubble can make detailed observations of galaxies 2 00:00:03,000 --> 00:00:08,000 but stars appear as featureless blobs? 3 00:00:08,000 --> 00:00:10,000 What the most distant object ever observed is? 4 00:00:10,000 --> 00:00:12,000 Who gets to use Hubble? 5 00:00:12,000 --> 00:00:15,000 Or what Hubble’s oddest discovery is? 6 00:00:15,000 --> 00:00:18,000 Then stay tuned. 7 00:00:35,000 --> 00:00:39,000 Episode 50: Q&A with Dr J 8 00:00:39,000 --> 00:00:45,000 Presented by Dr J, aka Dr Joe Liske 9 00:00:46,000 --> 00:00:49,000 Hello and welcome to the Hubblecast. 10 00:00:49,000 --> 00:00:52,000 Believe it or not this is in fact our 50th episode. 11 00:00:52,000 --> 00:00:57,000 To mark the occasion we’ve decided to do something a little different today. 12 00:00:57,000 --> 00:01:01,000 Last time we asked you to send your astronomy-related questions 13 00:01:01,000 --> 00:01:05,000 and over the last month or so, you’ve sent us hundreds of really good questions. 14 00:01:05,000 --> 00:01:10,000 Now unfortunately, there’s no way we can discuss them all. 15 00:01:10,000 --> 00:01:13,000 And so what we’ve done is, we’ve picked the ones we like best 16 00:01:13,000 --> 00:01:15,000 and we’ll try to answer them in today’s episode. 17 00:01:17,000 --> 00:01:25,000 What is the most empty spot of space you have ever seen? 18 00:01:25,000 --> 00:01:28,000 What’s the longest single-shot exposure ever recorded of any object or area of space by Hubble? 19 00:01:28,000 --> 00:01:32,000 What are the farthest objects discovered by Hubble? 20 00:01:32,000 --> 00:01:35,000 Three questions, just one answer. 21 00:01:36,000 --> 00:01:40,000 In 2003, Hubble was pointed at a part of the sky that is 22 00:01:40,000 --> 00:01:43,000 by normal standards at least, pretty empty. 23 00:01:43,000 --> 00:01:46,000 In particular, there are no bright stars in this area. 24 00:01:46,000 --> 00:01:48,000 Now Hubble observed this field, 25 00:01:48,000 --> 00:01:50,000 which is only about a tenth the size of the full moon, 26 00:01:50,000 --> 00:01:53,000 for almost a million seconds. 27 00:01:53,000 --> 00:01:58,000 That’s around 11.3 days’ worth of total exposure time. 28 00:01:58,000 --> 00:02:02,000 The result is an image that we call the Hubble Ultra Deep Field 29 00:02:02,000 --> 00:02:08,000 and it is in fact the deepest optical image of the Universe that humanity has ever produced. 30 00:02:08,000 --> 00:02:12,000 Almost every object you see in this image 31 00:02:12,000 --> 00:02:14,000 is in fact a very distant galaxy. 32 00:02:14,000 --> 00:02:17,000 In fact, let’s have a look at this guy over here. 33 00:02:17,000 --> 00:02:23,000 This is galaxy UDFj-39546284. 34 00:02:23,000 --> 00:02:24,000 Boring name, I know, 35 00:02:24,000 --> 00:02:28,000 but the point is that this is probably the most distant object ever discovered. 36 00:02:28,000 --> 00:02:32,000 Now its distance isn’t 100% confirmed yet, 37 00:02:32,000 --> 00:02:40,000 but it’s believed to be so far away that the light took 13.2 billion years to reach us. 38 00:02:40,000 --> 00:02:43,000 That’s about 96% of the age of the Universe. 39 00:02:46,000 --> 00:02:51,000 How do you prioritise what Hubble photographs? 40 00:02:52,000 --> 00:02:54,000 Now once a year, all the astronomers who want to use Hubble 41 00:02:54,000 --> 00:02:56,000 apply for observing time by submitting proposals 42 00:02:56,000 --> 00:03:01,000 that contain detailed descriptions of the scientific questions they want to address 43 00:03:01,000 --> 00:03:02,000 and the data they need. 44 00:03:02,000 --> 00:03:07,000 Now the total amount of observing time requested by all of the proposals 45 00:03:07,000 --> 00:03:12,000 is always much greater than the total amount of time that is actually available. 46 00:03:12,000 --> 00:03:16,000 And so there’s a committee of astronomers that looks at all the proposals 47 00:03:16,000 --> 00:03:19,000 and ranks them according to their scientific merit. 48 00:03:19,000 --> 00:03:23,000 And it’s only the best 10-15% of the proposals that actually get executed. 49 00:03:25,000 --> 00:03:28,000 If Hubble can zoom into distant galaxies with striking detail, 50 00:03:28,000 --> 00:03:34,000 why can’t it point the same cameras to a nearby star and map its surface in recognisable detail? 51 00:03:37,000 --> 00:03:41,000 This is the star Betelgeuse. It’s a very big star, and it's quite close to us 52 00:03:41,000 --> 00:03:43,000 only a few hundred light years away. 53 00:03:43,000 --> 00:03:47,000 This is the galaxy Arp 273 54 00:03:47,000 --> 00:03:51,000 which is about 500 000 times farther away than Betelgeuse. 55 00:03:51,000 --> 00:03:55,000 But at the same time, it’s about a billion times bigger. 56 00:03:55,000 --> 00:03:58,000 Which means that its apparent size on the sky 57 00:03:58,000 --> 00:04:02,000 is still about 2000 times larger than that of Betelgeuse. 58 00:04:02,000 --> 00:04:04,000 Although stars are very close to us 59 00:04:04,000 --> 00:04:06,000 they’re just too small 60 00:04:06,000 --> 00:04:09,000 so that being able to see details on the surface of a star 61 00:04:09,000 --> 00:04:12,000 is beyond the capabilities even of Hubble. 62 00:04:15,000 --> 00:04:20,000 When galaxies collide and incorporate each other, what happens to the black holes? 63 00:04:20,000 --> 00:04:23,000 Do they eventually merge into one giant black hole? 64 00:04:26,000 --> 00:04:28,000 Yup, that’s pretty much what happens. 65 00:04:28,000 --> 00:04:31,000 As Hubble helped us discover in the 1990s 66 00:04:31,000 --> 00:04:36,000 we think that almost all giant galaxies contain a central, supermassive black hole. 67 00:04:36,000 --> 00:04:40,000 In addition, galaxy collisions are very common, they happen all the time 68 00:04:40,000 --> 00:04:43,000 and again, Hubble has showed us lots of great images of these collisions. 69 00:04:43,000 --> 00:04:49,000 Now, eventually the two galaxies merge and settle into a single bigger new galaxy 70 00:04:49,000 --> 00:04:54,000 and during this process, the same thing happens with the supermassive black holes. 71 00:04:54,000 --> 00:04:59,000 They merge into a single, even bigger, supermassive black hole 72 00:04:59,000 --> 00:05:00,000 at the centre of the new galaxy. 73 00:05:00,000 --> 00:05:05,000 Now astronomers have made computer simulations of how this process works 74 00:05:05,000 --> 00:05:08,000 but we also have some pretty good observational evidence 75 00:05:08,000 --> 00:05:11,000 that this process really does take place. 76 00:05:12,000 --> 00:05:15,000 After watching the 49th episode, I was wondering whether there’s more dynamics 77 00:05:15,000 --> 00:05:19,000 that Hubble could help identify, like gravity lens effects, 78 00:05:19,000 --> 00:05:23,000 rotating objects or clusters, collisions and so on. 79 00:05:28,000 --> 00:05:31,000 In episode 49, we looked at so-called Herbig-Haro objects 80 00:05:31,000 --> 00:05:35,000 which are jets of matter that are shot out by newborn stars. 81 00:05:35,000 --> 00:05:38,000 Now Hubble was able to film the motion of these jets 82 00:05:38,000 --> 00:05:41,000 over a time period of about 14 years. 83 00:05:41,000 --> 00:05:44,000 And it is indeed true that over the past 20 years, 84 00:05:44,000 --> 00:05:47,000 Hubble has been able to capture the change or the motion 85 00:05:47,000 --> 00:05:50,000 of a number of other phenomena and objects. 86 00:05:50,000 --> 00:05:53,000 Now some of these videos have been morphed together 87 00:05:53,000 --> 00:05:56,000 using computer software to smooth out the motion, 88 00:05:56,000 --> 00:06:00,000 but everything you are about to see is based on real Hubble images. 89 00:06:03,000 --> 00:06:05,000 Nearby objects within the solar system 90 00:06:05,000 --> 00:06:08,000 show the most impressive movement in Hubble pictures. 91 00:06:08,000 --> 00:06:12,000 Planets rotate, and their satellites move around their orbits. 92 00:06:12,000 --> 00:06:14,000 Like the Northern Lights here on Earth, 93 00:06:14,000 --> 00:06:18,000 Saturn has aurorae, and Hubble has watched them dance. 94 00:06:18,000 --> 00:06:23,000 Comets and asteroids sweep around the Sun, and sometimes even break up. 95 00:06:23,000 --> 00:06:28,000 But there are also objects further away that we can see move. 96 00:06:28,000 --> 00:06:31,000 Fomalhaut b was the first planet outside the solar system 97 00:06:31,000 --> 00:06:34,000 Fomalhaut b was the first planet outside the solar system to be directly imaged in visible light 98 00:06:34,000 --> 00:06:39,000 and images taken 21 months apart show it inching along its orbit. 99 00:06:39,000 --> 00:06:42,000 Hubble has also imaged a flash of light 100 00:06:42,000 --> 00:06:47,000 propagating through the dust surrounding the star V838 Monocerotis. 101 00:06:47,000 --> 00:06:50,000 The distances are so huge that this sequence took 4 years to film 102 00:06:50,000 --> 00:06:54,000 even though it’s moving at the speed of light. 103 00:06:56,000 --> 00:06:58,000 Cassiopeia A 104 00:06:58,000 --> 00:07:02,000 a cloud of debris left over from a supernova that exploded three centuries ago 105 00:07:02,000 --> 00:07:07,000 is still expanding, and Hubble observations 9 months apart show the material moving. 106 00:07:14,000 --> 00:07:17,000 One of the most distant objects that Hubble has been able to watch 107 00:07:17,000 --> 00:07:20,000 change over time is Supernova 1987a 108 00:07:20,000 --> 00:07:25,000 the explosion of a star in the Large Magellanic Cloud that happened in 1987. 109 00:07:25,000 --> 00:07:30,000 Over the past 20 years, Hubble has watched the shockwave spread out 110 00:07:30,000 --> 00:07:33,000 and light up the gas surrounding the star. 111 00:07:33,000 --> 00:07:37,000 Now Hubble is really good at this type of observation because 112 00:07:37,000 --> 00:07:42,000 a) its images are very detailed – so it can spot even very subtle motion 113 00:07:42,000 --> 00:07:46,000 and b) it’s been in operation for so long, almost 22 years now. 114 00:07:49,000 --> 00:07:51,000 Can Hubble detect potential supernovae, 115 00:07:51,000 --> 00:07:54,000 and if so are we likely to see one from the surface of the Earth, 116 00:07:54,000 --> 00:07:57,000 and can we know when it’s likely to occur? 117 00:08:00,000 --> 00:08:03,000 Predicting supernovae is a bit like predicting earthquakes 118 00:08:03,000 --> 00:08:06,000 we can spot which stars are likely to explode 119 00:08:06,000 --> 00:08:10,000 but we can’t tell when exactly the explosion is going to happen. 120 00:08:10,000 --> 00:08:13,000 One of the supernova candidates which is closest to Earth 121 00:08:13,000 --> 00:08:18,000 is the star Eta Carinae, which is about 7 to 8000 light years away. 122 00:08:18,000 --> 00:08:21,000 Now this star nearly exploded already in the 19th century 123 00:08:21,000 --> 00:08:24,000 and when Hubble came to image it in the 1990s 124 00:08:24,000 --> 00:08:27,000 the huge gas cloud that was ejected 125 00:08:27,000 --> 00:08:30,000 during that failed supernova was clearly visible. 126 00:08:30,000 --> 00:08:34,000 Now again, we can’t predict exactly when Eta Carinae is going to explode 127 00:08:34,000 --> 00:08:38,000 it could be tomorrow, or it could be a million years from now. 128 00:08:38,000 --> 00:08:42,000 But of course in astronomical terms, that’s just any minute now! 129 00:08:44,000 --> 00:08:47,000 What is the most odd thing you guys have discovered with Hubble? 130 00:08:50,000 --> 00:08:53,000 Well, one thing’s for sure, although this came up a lot in the questions, 131 00:08:53,000 --> 00:08:56,000 it’s not little green men, and it’s not planet X. 132 00:09:02,000 --> 00:09:03,000 More seriously though 133 00:09:03,000 --> 00:09:08,000 you might have heard that the 2011 Nobel prize for physics was awarded 134 00:09:08,000 --> 00:09:12,000 for the discovery that the expansion of the Universe is accelerating. 135 00:09:12,000 --> 00:09:17,000 Hubble played a part in that discovery, and it came as a complete surprise to everyone. 136 00:09:17,000 --> 00:09:21,000 Now, such revolutionary and completely unforeseen discoveries 137 00:09:21,000 --> 00:09:23,000 are of course very, very rare. 138 00:09:23,000 --> 00:09:29,000 But from time to time, Hubble does send us images that at least *look* surprising. 139 00:09:29,000 --> 00:09:32,000 And I’ll leave you with a collection of these. 140 00:09:32,000 --> 00:09:36,000 This is Dr J signing off for the Hubblecast. 141 00:09:36,000 --> 00:09:39,000 Once again, and for the fiftieth time, nature has surprised us 142 00:09:39,000 --> 00:09:42,000 beyond our wildest imagination. 143 00:10:00,000 --> 00:10:03,000 Thanks for all the questions and keep in touch! 144 00:10:03,000 --> 00:10:06,000 www.facebook.com/hubbleesa www.twitter.com/hubble_space 145 00:10:06,000 --> 00:10:10,000 Transcribed by ESA/Hubble